STAGE

5

Impact Evaluations

Measure what matters. Self-assess a project against the six OECD DAC evaluation criteria and build an evaluation plan.

Official impact & taxonomy indicators

Supplied external-AI extract · Original-PDF verification pending · Indicators are documented thresholds or targets, not verified project outcomes.

12 indicators

OFFICIAL SOURCE COLLECTION · 2026-11-01

Evaluation & impact frameworks

All sources →

Guidance, not certification or verified outcomes. Proposed GCF HRMF is not presented as adopted.

Project self-assessment

Rate your project honestly on each criterion.

Relevance

Developing

Does it respond to the community's real climate needs?

Coherence

Developing

Does it fit with other local and national efforts?

Effectiveness

Developing

Is it achieving its intended results?

Efficiency

Developing

Are resources used well and on time?

Impact

Developing

What difference does it make, intended or not?

Sustainability

Developing

Will the benefits last after support ends?

Personal self-assessment, not a verified impact score or OECD certification.

Overall

3.0 / 5

Focus next on

Relevance

Build an evaluation plan

AI suggestions — never a source of facts. Verify before publishing.

Join the evaluator directory

Saved on this device for now. Shared community storage comes once accounts are enabled.

Evaluators & experts

    No evaluators listed yet

    Experts who join will appear here.